Premier League Regular Season - 10
热刺 0 - 1 FT 切尔西
比赛事件
7' ↓ L. Bergvall ↑X. Simons
Joao Pedro (M. Caicedo) 34'
45'+3 Rodrigo Bentancur
Trevoh Chalobah 45'+3
HT
47' Kevin Danso
59' Xavi Simons
60' ↓ R. Bentancur ↑Richarlison
60' ↓ K. Danso ↑C. Romero
↓ A. Garnacho ↑J. Gittens 66'
Enzo Fernández 68'
73' ↓ P. Porro ↑D. Udogie
73' ↓ R. Kolo Muani ↑B. Johnson
73' ↓ Tottenham ↑W. Odobert
74' Mohammed Kudus
↓ M. Gusto ↑R. Lavia 76'
↓ P. Neto ↑Estêvão 85'
↓ W. Fofana ↑T. Adarabioyo 89'
FT
球员卡牌
我们对本场每位球员的点评
Tottenham
门将
G. Vicario
章鱼
8
扑救
8
扑救
0
失球
100%
扑救率
后卫
P. Porro
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
73
总时间
73
登场
K. Danso
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
60
总时间
60
登场
M. van de Ven
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
D. Spence
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
中场
J. Palhinha
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
R. Bentancur
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
60
总时间
60
登场
M. Kudus
打偏王
2
射门
2
射门
0
进球
1
射正
P. M. Sarr
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
L. Bergvall
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
7
总时间
7
登场
前锋
R. Kolo Muani
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
73
总时间
73
登场
替补
A. Kinsky
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
D. Udogie
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
17
总时间
首发
登场
C. Romero
铁壁
0
被过次数
0
被过次数
3
抢断
75%
对抗胜率
X. Simons
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
66
总时间
首发
登场
Richarlison
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
30
总时间
首发
登场
M. Tel
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
B. Johnson
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
17
总时间
首发
登场
W. Odobert
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
17
总时间
首发
登场
D. Scarlett
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
Chelsea
门将
R. Sanchez
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
后卫
M. Gusto
建筑师
2
关键传球
2
关键传球
0
助攻
24%
传球准确
W. Fofana
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
T. Chalobah
搅局者
2
造犯规
2
造犯规
3
对抗胜
0
造点球
M. Cucurella
铁壁
0
被过次数
0
被过次数
3
抢断
67%
对抗胜率
中场
R. James
打偏王
2
射门
2
射门
0
进球
0
射正
M. Caicedo
清道夫
5
清理
5
清理
5
拦截
0
封堵
P. Neto
末班车
5
尾段时间
5
尾段时间
85
总时间
85
登场
E. Fernandez
建筑师
4
关键传球
4
关键传球
0
助攻
37%
传球准确
A. Garnacho
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
66
总时间
66
登场
前锋
Joao Pedro
磁铁
46
活跃度
46
活跃度
23
传球
23
对抗
替补
F. Jorgensen
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
T. Adarabioyo
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
8
总时间
首发
登场
J. Acheampong
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
J. Hato
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
R. Lavia
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
14
总时间
首发
登场
Andrey Santos
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
Estêvão
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
12
总时间
首发
登场
J. Gittens
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
24
总时间
首发
登场
M. Guiu
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
历史交锋
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Competition | Venue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/04/03 | Chelsea | 1 - 0 | Tottenham | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2024/12/08 | Tottenham | 3 - 4 | Chelsea | Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur Stadium |
| 2024/05/02 | Chelsea | 2 - 0 | Tottenham | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2023/11/06 | Tottenham | 1 - 4 | Chelsea | Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur Stadium |
| 2023/02/26 | Tottenham | 2 - 0 | Chelsea | Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur Stadium |
| 2022/08/14 | Chelsea | 2 - 2 | Tottenham | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2022/01/23 | Chelsea | 2 - 0 | Tottenham | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2022/01/12 | Tottenham | 0 - 1 | Chelsea | League Cup | Tottenham Hotspur Stadium |
| 2022/01/05 | Chelsea | 2 - 0 | Tottenham | League Cup | Stamford Bridge |
Tottenham Win
Chelsea Win
Draw
联赛积分榜
P: 10 GD: +15
P: 10 GD: +12
P: 10 GD: +4
P: 10 GD: +4
P: 10 GD: +3
P: 10 GD: +9
P: 10 GD: +7
P: 10 GD: +1
P: 10 GD: +5
P: 10 GD: +2
P: 10 GD: -1
P: 10 GD: -2
P: 10 GD: -1
P: 10 GD: -3
P: 10 GD: -2
P: 10 GD: -8
P: 10 GD: -7
P: 10 GD: -11
P: 10 GD: -12
联赛积分榜
P: 31 GD: +39
P: 30 GD: +32
P: 31 GD: +13
P: 30 GD: +3
P: 31 GD: +8
P: 31 GD: +15
P: 31 GD: +4
P: 31 GD: +2
P: 31 GD: -1
P: 31 GD: +4
P: 31 GD: -4
P: 31 GD: -1
P: 31 GD: -2
P: 30 GD: -2
P: 31 GD: -11
P: 30 GD: -7
P: 30 GD: -15
P: 30 GD: -19
P: 31 GD: -28
赛前预告与赛后回顾,帮你判断哪些比赛值得一看
Vicario's Eight Saves Against the Tide: Chelsea Steals Six Points in a Match That Refused to Breathe
表现平平 Futmetrix 评分: 50/100. One moment of clinical finishing from João Pedro proved enough to break a defensive masterclass that left both teams exhausted but unsatisfied.
When One Shot Becomes Destiny
Tottenham absorbed 15 shots. Fifteen. Guglielmo Vicario turned himself into concrete, producing eight saves that should have been framed. Yet in the 34th minute, João Pedro found the one gap that mattered—a clinical finish from Chelsea's best chance of the half, assisted by M. Caicedo. The Balance tilted irrevocably. The Intensity of an attacking siege never translated into a rout because Spurs' back line refused to crack entirely, even as the shot count spiraled toward absurdity.
The Six-Pointer That Felt Like a Whimper
This was a Stakes match—both teams locked at 17 points, separated by position alone. Sixth versus seventh. The kind of fixture that should crackle with desperation. Instead, it became a study in asymmetric football: Chelsea controlled the game with 52% possession and 81% pass accuracy, yet Tottenham's 48% felt less like resistance and more like resignation. The attacking siege was relentless—15 shots to 3, a 5:1 dominance ratio that would have buried most opponents. But Tottenham's defensive shape held firm enough to prevent humiliation, even if it couldn't prevent defeat.
The corner pressure mounted—11 total set pieces created a constant low-level threat, yet none materialized into danger. Reece James orchestrated Chelsea's midfield with precision (7.7 rating), his key pass unlocking spaces that Spurs' midfield couldn't adequately cover. Yet the match never boiled over. Six yellow cards were issued—four to Tottenham, two to Chelsea—a sign that frustration was building without release. This was chess played at walking pace.
The Verdict's Sting
A 36/100 rating reflects the reality: tactical discipline suffocated entertainment. One goal in 90 minutes from an expected goals differential of 3.68-0.10 tells the story of a match where Chelsea's efficiency masked their inability to dominate convincingly, and Tottenham's defensive solidity couldn't compensate for their creative void. Intensity was present but muted. Balance shifted decisively after 34 minutes and never returned. The Stakes were high, but the execution was low-key.
Key Questions
What made Guglielmo Vicario the Man of the Match?
Eight saves against a 15-shot barrage. Vicario's 8.7 rating reflects his wall-like presence—he made the impossible routine, keeping Tottenham competitive despite Chelsea's dominance.
What does this mean for Tottenham's season?
A setback in their top-four push. Still sixth on 17 points, but the lack of attacking threat (0.10 xG) suggests structural issues beyond one bad day. Form reads LWLWD—inconsistency defines them.
Why is this match rated 36/100?
One goal, zero drama, minimal Upset potential. Chelsea's siege lacked killer instinct; Tottenham never threatened. Tactical stalemate masquerading as a derby—efficient, not entertaining.
什么是 Futmetrix Score?
Futmetrix Score 是我们对比赛观赏性的0-100评分。我们综合比赛激烈程度、均衡度、重要性和球星效应,告诉你这场比赛是否值得观看。
Chaos and Class in North London
精彩纷呈 Futmetrix 评分: 79/100. A clash of contrasting trajectories where Chelsea's clinical efficiency meets Tottenham's desperate need to find consistency in a high-stakes environment.
The Setup
As the Premier League enters Round 10, the narrative at the stadium centers on a massive gap in Form. Chelsea arrives sitting comfortably in 3rd place, fueled by a Balance score of 10.0 that suggests a side finally in sync. Conversely, Tottenham finds itself languishing in 10th, haunted by a run of only one win in their last five matches. Despite the discrepancy in the table, our Stars metric remains high at 8.2, driven by the presence of elite talents like C. Palmer and E. Fernández, ensuring this remains a marquee fixture regardless of current standings.
Key Battle
This match will be won or lost in the transition phase. The home side's high defensive line is inherently risky, and they must find a way to contain the visitors' rapid counter-attacking unit. Without specific individual markers to focus on, the collective coordination of the home midfield will be tested against the physical dominance of M. Caicedo, who has been instrumental in stabilizing the away side's engine room.
Our Prediction
Chelsea's superior Form and tactical Balance give them a 39.5% probability of victory. Expect a frantic opening where Tottenham pushes high, but the visitors' ability to exploit space behind the full-backs should prove decisive. We anticipate a 1-2 victory for the Blues, with the winning goal coming from a late breakout as the game stretches.