Premier League Regular Season - 1
切尔西 0 - 0 FT 水晶宫
比赛事件
Eberechi Eze 14'
24' Reece James
Daniel Muñoz 28'
HT
Will Hughes 49'
54' ↓ J. Gittens ↑Estêvão
↓ W. Hughes ↑J. Lerma 70'
73' ↓ Joao Pedro ↑L. Delap
74' Estêvão Willian
79' ↓ E. Fernandez ↑Andrey Santos
79' ↓ R. James ↑M. Gusto
↓ E. Eze ↑J. Devenny 84'
FT
球员卡牌
我们对本场每位球员的点评
Chelsea
门将
R. Sanchez
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
后卫
R. James
建筑师
3
关键传球
3
关键传球
0
助攻
64%
传球准确
J. Acheampong
磁铁
107
活跃度
107
活跃度
93
传球
14
对抗
T. Chalobah
磁铁
109
活跃度
109
活跃度
101
传球
8
对抗
M. Cucurella
搅局者
2
造犯规
2
造犯规
7
对抗胜
0
造点球
中场
E. Fernandez
末班车
11
尾段时间
11
尾段时间
79
总时间
79
登场
M. Caicedo
磁铁
78
活跃度
78
活跃度
67
传球
11
对抗
P. Neto
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
C. Palmer
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
J. Gittens
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
54
总时间
54
登场
前锋
Joao Pedro
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
73
总时间
73
登场
替补
F. Jorgensen
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
J. Hato
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
M. Gusto
打偏王
1
射门
1
射门
0
进球
0
射正
W. Fofana
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
D. Essugo
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
Andrey Santos
打偏王
2
射门
2
射门
0
进球
1
射正
L. Delap
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
18
总时间
首发
登场
T. George
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
Estêvão
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
37
总时间
首发
登场
Crystal Palace
门将
D. Henderson
建筑师
1
关键传球
1
关键传球
0
助攻
20%
传球准确
后卫
C. Richards
铁壁
0
被过次数
0
被过次数
2
抢断
100%
对抗胜率
M. Lacroix
铁壁
0
被过次数
0
被过次数
3
抢断
60%
对抗胜率
M. Guehi
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
中场
D. Munoz
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
A. Wharton
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
W. Hughes
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
70
总时间
70
登场
T. Mitchell
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
替补
W. Benitez
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
N. Clyne
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
B. Sosa
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
J. Lerma
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
21
总时间
首发
登场
R. Esse
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
J. Rak-Sakyi
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
J. Devenny
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
13
总时间
首发
登场
R. Cardines
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
O. Edouard
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
历史交锋
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Competition | Venue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/08/17 | Chelsea | 0 - 0 | Crystal Palace | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2025/01/04 | Crystal Palace | 1 - 1 | Chelsea | Premier League | Selhurst Park |
| 2024/09/01 | Chelsea | 1 - 1 | Crystal Palace | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2024/02/12 | Crystal Palace | 1 - 3 | Chelsea | Premier League | Selhurst Park |
| 2023/12/27 | Chelsea | 2 - 1 | Crystal Palace | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
| 2023/01/15 | Chelsea | 1 - 0 | Crystal Palace | Premier League | Stamford Bridge |
2025/08/17
2025/01/04
2024/09/01
2024/02/12
2023/12/27
2023/01/15
Chelsea Win
Crystal Palace Win
Draw
联赛积分榜
联赛积分榜
P: 31 GD: +39
P: 30 GD: +32
P: 31 GD: +13
P: 30 GD: +3
P: 31 GD: +8
P: 31 GD: +15
P: 31 GD: +4
P: 31 GD: +2
P: 31 GD: -1
P: 31 GD: +4
P: 31 GD: -4
P: 31 GD: -1
P: 31 GD: -2
P: 30 GD: -2
P: 31 GD: -11
P: 30 GD: -7
P: 30 GD: -15
P: 30 GD: -19
P: 31 GD: -28
赛前预告与赛后回顾,帮你判断哪些比赛值得一看
VAR's 14th-Minute Execution: How One Disallowed Goal Suffocated a Potential Classic
别看了 Futmetrix 评分: 20/100. Chelsea's 72% possession and 19 shots produced nothing but frustration—a masterclass in sterile control undone by Palace's stubborn resistance and VAR's early intervention.
When a Goal Cancellation Kills the Narrative
Crystal Palace had it. In the 14th minute, Eberechi Eze found the net with a clinical finish that should've rewired the entire match. VAR saw something—offside, handball, a toenail out of place—and erased it. The Stakes shifted instantly. Palace's Intensity evaporated. Chelsea, already drowning in possession (568 passes, 90% accuracy), became a team without an opponent.
What followed was tactical theater without plot. Chelsea launched 19 shots. Eleven found the box. Three troubled the goalkeeper. Reece James (7.9 rating) orchestrated from right-back with three key passes, a defensive colossus in an ocean of blue shirts. Moisés Caicedo (7.6) controlled midfield tempo with the precision of a metronome, yet the ball movement became wallpaper—pretty but purposeless. Trevoh Chalobah (7.5) marshaled the backline into a fortress that never faced genuine siege.
Palace's counter-threat materialized in four shots on target—respectable given the Balance disparity. But without Eze's goal standing, their narrative collapsed into reactive defending. Thirteen corners for Chelsea generated nothing. The set-piece pressure mounted, yet Palace's goalkeeper made only two saves while Chelsea's made four. When you're defending 72% possession and still leaving your opponent scoreless, that's not resilience—it's a mutual agreement to bore.
The yellow card tally (five total: two Chelsea, three Palace) hinted at frustration. Both teams started their season with identical records: one point from one draw. This was supposed to separate them. Instead, it reinforced the Stakes—mid-table mediocrity where neither side could impose will. VAR's decision in minute 14 didn't just cancel a goal; it cancelled the match's oxygen.
Key Questions
How did VAR change this match?
Eze's disallowed 14th-minute goal psychologically broke Palace. Chelsea dominated after, but couldn't convert dominance into chances. One decision killed the narrative.
Why is this match rated 19/100?
Zero goals, 7 shots on target from 30 attempts, and VAR's early intervention killed competitive tension. Possession without purpose. Intensity collapsed.
什么是 Futmetrix Score?
Futmetrix Score 是我们对比赛观赏性的0-100评分。我们综合比赛激烈程度、均衡度、重要性和球星效应,告诉你这场比赛是否值得观看。
London’s Elite Clash for Champions League Position
别看了 Futmetrix 评分: 7/100. This showdown at the stadium represents a critical junction for two sides separated by just three points in the hunt for European football.
The Setup
The race for the Top 4 takes center stage as Chelsea welcome Crystal Palace for a high-intensity London derby. Sitting in 3rd place, the Blues have found a devastating Form, winning four of their last five matches to remain firmly in the qualification spots. However, the Stakes are equally high for the visitors; Palace sit just three points behind in 6th, knowing a victory could blow the race for the elite positions wide open. Despite a lower overall Balance score, the sheer volume of Stars on the pitch, including C. Palmer, E. Fernández, and M. Caicedo, ensures this will be a match decided by individual brilliance under the August sun.
Key Battle
The outcome hinges on the tactical struggle between Chelsea's expansive midfield and the away side’s disciplined defensive unit. While the home side will look to M. Caicedo to anchor the pitch and allow E. Fernández to dictate the tempo, the Crystal Palace back line must maintain a rigid shape. The away unit has been resilient this season, conceding only nine goals, and their ability to absorb pressure before launching quick transitions will be the ultimate test for Chelsea’s high defensive line.
Our Prediction
Chelsea are likely to dominate possession, utilizing the creative movement of C. Palmer to unlock a stubborn defense. While Palace are dangerous on the break, the technical depth of the Blues should prevail. We expect a hard-fought 2-1 victory for the home side, secured by a late moment of magic from their world-class talent.