AFC Champions League League Phase East - 1
墨尔本城 0 - 2 FT 广岛三箭
比赛事件
Shunki Higashi 34'
↓ K. Kinoshita ↑M. Kato 43'
HT
46' ↓ M. Leckie ↑E. Durakovic
↓ S. Higashi ↑N. Arai 46'
Marcos Junior 52'
Ju-sung Kim 61'
Hayato Araki 63'
↓ Kim Ju-Sung ↑T. Shiotani 67'
↓ Marcos Junior ↑N. Maeda 67'
76' ↓ K. Rahmani ↑B. Mazzeo
77' ↓ N. Atkinson ↑H. Shillington
77' ↓ A. Kuen ↑Z. Schreiber
Y. Nakajima (S. Nakano) 80'
↓ Y. Nakajima ↑T. Arslan 83'
87' ↓ M. Caputo ↑L. Wong
FT
球员卡牌
我们对本场每位球员的点评
Melbourne City
门将
P. Beach 
乌龙
送出点球
失误
送出点球
失误
1
犯规
6.2
评分
后卫
N. Atkinson 
搅局者
2
造犯规
2
造犯规
3
对抗胜
0
造点球
G. Ferreyra 
铁壁
0
被过次数
0
被过次数
2
抢断
71%
对抗胜率
S. Souprayen 
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
A. Behich
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
中场
前锋
T. Kanamori
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
M. Caputo 
NPC
87
分钟
87
分钟
11%
传球准确
6.2
评分
K. Rahmani
末班车
14
尾段时间
14
尾段时间
76
总时间
76
登场
替补
D. Ochsenham 
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
H. Shillington
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
13
总时间
首发
登场
E. Durakovic
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
45
总时间
首发
登场
Z. Schreiber
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
13
总时间
首发
登场
B. Mazzeo
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
14
总时间
首发
登场
L. Bonetig
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
R. Kalms
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
M. Baker
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
A. Mackintosh
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
L. Wong
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
A. Cartwright
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
B. Kutleshi
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
Sanfrecce Hiroshima
门将
K. Osako
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
90
分钟
后卫
S. Sasaki
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
H. Araki 
磁铁
87
活跃度
87
活跃度
77
传球
10
对抗
Kim Ju-Sung
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
67
总时间
67
登场
中场
S. Nakano 
助攻手
1
助攻
1
助攻
3
关键传球
7.2
评分
H. Kawabe
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
S. Tanaka
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
S. Higashi
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
45
总时间
46
登场
前锋
Y. Nakajima 
锁胜者
1
绝杀进球
1
绝杀进球
0
绝杀助攻
75
分钟
Marcos Junior 
狙击手
50%
转化率
50%
转化率
1
进球
2
射门
K. Kinoshita
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
43
总时间
43
登场
替补
C. Hill
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
Jeong Min-Ki
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
N. Arai
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
45
总时间
首发
登场
T. Shiotani
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
23
总时间
首发
登场
T. Yamasaki
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
T. Arslan
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
13
总时间
首发
登场
Y. Chajima
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
S. Koshimichi
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
D. Suga
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
M. Kato
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
47
总时间
首发
登场
S. Kobayashi
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
N. Maeda
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
23
总时间
首发
登场
联赛积分榜
| Pos | 球队 | P | Pts | GF | GA | GD | 近况 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vissel Kobe | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | +3 | WSHANGHAI SIPG 0 - 3 Vissel Kobe (17-09-2025) |
| 2 | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | +2 | WMelbourne City 0 - 2 Sanfrecce Hiroshima (16-09-2025) |
| 3 | Gangwon FC | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | WGangwon FC 2 - 1 Shanghai Shenhua (16-09-2025) |
| 4 | Ulsan Hyundai FC | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | WUlsan Hyundai FC 2 - 1 Chengdu Better City (17-09-2025) |
| 5 | Buriram United | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | WBuriram United 2 - 1 Johor Darul Takzim FC (16-09-2025) |
| 6 | Machida Zelvia | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | DMachida Zelvia 1 - 1 FC Seoul (16-09-2025) |
| 7 | FC Seoul | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | DMachida Zelvia 1 - 1 FC Seoul (16-09-2025) |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | LGangwon FC 2 - 1 Shanghai Shenhua (16-09-2025) |
| 9 | Johor Darul Takzim FC | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | LBuriram United 2 - 1 Johor Darul Takzim FC (16-09-2025) |
| 10 | Chengdu Better City | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -1 | LUlsan Hyundai FC 2 - 1 Chengdu Better City (17-09-2025) |
| 11 | Melbourne City | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | LMelbourne City 0 - 2 Sanfrecce Hiroshima (16-09-2025) |
| 12 | SHANGHAI SIPG | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | -3 | LSHANGHAI SIPG 0 - 3 Vissel Kobe (17-09-2025) |
联赛积分榜
P: 8 GD: +8
P: 8 GD: +7
P: 8 GD: +4
P: 8 GD: +2
P: 8 GD: +2
P: 8 GD: +1
P: 8 GD: +1
P: 8 GD: -2
P: 8 GD: -2
P: 8 GD: -4
P: 8 GD: -8
赛前预告与赛后回顾，帮你判断哪些比赛值得一看
Clinical Sanfrecce Silence AAMI Park
别看了 Futmetrix 评分: 15/100. Sanfrecce Hiroshima's defensive discipline and clinical edge allowed them to leapfrog Melbourne City in a pivotal AFC Champions League encounter.
The Tactical Standoff at AAMI Park
The atmosphere at AAMI Park was one of cautious anticipation as Melbourne City looked to solidify their position in the upper echelons of the group. However, the early phase was dictated by the visitors, who established control with 55% possession. An Intensity rating of 2.6 reflects a match played at a measured tempo, where tactical positioning outweighed frantic end-to-end action. Sanfrecce Hiroshima circulated the ball with precision, completing 409 accurate passes at a 79% success rate. The hosts struggled to find any rhythm in transition, often recycled the ball in their own half where they recorded 228 of their total passes. This early dominance from the Japanese side forced the Australian outfit into a reactive stance, primarily absorbing pressure rather than initiating their own offensive sequences.
The Pivot: Efficiency vs Futility
The match reached its defining moment as the disparity in clinical finishing became impossible to ignore. A Balance score of 0.9 underscores how the contest tilted toward the visitors, despite the relatively even foul count of ten apiece. Sanfrecce Hiroshima were lethal with their opportunities, creating three big chances and directing four shots on target. In stark contrast, Melbourne City endured a nightmare in the final third; they failed to register a single shot on target throughout the ninety minutes, finishing with an expected goals (xG) value of zero. Even with 87 attacks, the home side could not breach a resolute Hiroshima defense that won 33 aerial duels. This lack of a "Sniper" edge meant that any promising buildup from the hosts ultimately withered before testing the goalkeeper, allowing the visitors to capitalize and establish a commanding two-goal cushion.
Resolution: Sanfrecce Climb the Table
The 0-2 result at the final whistle carries significant weight for the remainder of the campaign. With a Stakes score of 1.0, this was a direct battle for continental positioning, and the victory propels Sanfrecce Hiroshima into third place, leapfrogging their hosts. The Japanese side displayed the composure necessary for elite away performances, maintaining their defensive shape even as Melbourne attempted a late, fruitless surge. For the Australian side, a second loss in seven games highlights a growing concern regarding their offensive output at this level. An Upset Factor of 0.0 confirms that while the home crowd was disappointed, the result was a fair reflection of the tactical execution on display. Sanfrecce leaves Melbourne with their momentum restored, while the hosts must regroup quickly to address the lack of creativity that plagued them on home soil.
Key Questions
What was the final score between Melbourne City and Sanfrecce Hiroshima?
Sanfrecce Hiroshima won the match 0-2 at AAMI Park.
How many shots on target did Melbourne City have?
Melbourne City failed to record a single shot on target during the match.
How does this result affect the league standings?
Sanfrecce Hiroshima moves up to 3rd place, overtaking Melbourne City who drops to 4th.
什么是 Futmetrix Score?
Futmetrix Score 是我们对比赛观赏性的0-100评分。我们综合比赛激烈程度、均衡度、重要性和球星效应，告诉你这场比赛是否值得观看。
Tactical Grit Over Star Power in Melbourne
别看了 Futmetrix 评分: 16/100. This opening fixture is less about individual flair and more about defensive resilience as both clubs prioritize a stable start to the League Phase.
The Setup
As the AFC Champions League kicks off at AAMI Park on September 16, 2025, Melbourne City enters with a Form rating of 2.5, reflecting a steady if unspectacular domestic run. Their Balance score of 3.5 suggests a team that is well-drilled but perhaps lacks the clinical edge needed to blow opponents away. They face a Sanfrecce Hiroshima side that has been remarkably consistent, sitting third in their respective domestic standings. With a Stakes rating of 1.0, the narrative is firmly about the "survive and advance" mentality; neither side wants to lose their footing in the very first round of the East League Phase.
Key Battle
The core of this match will be won in the transition. Sanfrecce Hiroshima relies heavily on the defensive organization led by H. Araki and the shot-stopping reliability of K. Osako. Melbourne City’s attacking unit must find a way to break through a disciplined Japanese backline that has only conceded four goals in their last seven outings. Without high-profile Stars to provide moments of individual magic, as indicated by a low 1.7 rating in that category, the burden falls on the collective movement of the home midfield to disrupt the rhythm of H. Kawabe and the visiting engine room.
Our Prediction
Expect a cagey affair where risks are kept to a minimum. Sanfrecce Hiroshima is likely to dictate the tempo through short passing, while Melbourne City will look to exploit the wings. However, given the defensive focus of both managers in this continental opener, clear-cut chances will be rare. A 1-1 draw is the most probable outcome, providing both teams with a foundational point to build upon in the long road toward the top-8 direct qualification spots.