Premier League Regular Season - 4
西汉姆联 0 - 3 FT 热刺
比赛事件
HT
P. M. Sarr (X. Simons) 47'
Djed Spence 52'
54' Tomáš Souček
L. Bergvall (C. Romero) 57'
61' ↓ C. Summerville ↑Luis Guilherme
61' ↓ M. Fernandes ↑S. Magassa
M. van de Ven (L. Bergvall) 64'
68' ↓ Lucas Paqueta ↑C. Wilson
↓ X. Simons ↑Richarlison 71'
↓ D. Spence ↑D. Udogie 71'
↓ M. Tel ↑W. Odobert 79'
↓ M. van de Ven ↑K. Danso 80'
↓ L. Bergvall ↑B. Johnson 80'
90'+2 ↓ J. Ward-Prowse ↑A. Irving
FT
球员卡牌
我们对本场每位球员的点评
West Ham
门将
M. Hermansen
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
后卫
K. Walker-Peters
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
K. Mavropanos
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
90
总时间
首发
登场
M. Kilman
打偏王
1
射门
1
射门
0
进球
0
射正
M. Diouf
铁壁
0
被过次数
0
被过次数
3
抢断
56%
对抗胜率
中场
T. Soucek
乌龙
红牌
失误
红牌
失误
2
犯规
6.2
评分
J. Ward-Prowse
👻 隐形人 没有值得一提的表现
J. Bowen
搅局者
3
造犯规
3
造犯规
5
对抗胜
0
造点球
M. Fernandes
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
61
总时间
61
登场
C. Summerville
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
61
总时间
61
登场
前锋
Lucas Paqueta
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
68
总时间
68
登场
替补
L. Fabianski
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
A. Areola
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
Igor
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
S. Magassa
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
29
总时间
首发
登场
F. Potts
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
A. Irving
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
1
总时间
首发
登场
C. Wilson
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
22
总时间
首发
登场
N. Fullkrug
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
Luis Guilherme
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
29
总时间
首发
登场
Tottenham
门将
G. Vicario
搅局者
1
造犯规
1
造犯规
1
对抗胜
0
造点球
后卫
P. Porro
建筑师
2
关键传球
2
关键传球
0
助攻
38%
传球准确
C. Romero
建筑师
2
关键传球
2
关键传球
1
助攻
75%
传球准确
M. van de Ven
狙击手
100%
转化率
100%
转化率
1
进球
1
射门
D. Spence
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
71
总时间
71
登场
中场
P. M. Sarr
狙击手
100%
转化率
100%
转化率
1
进球
1
射门
J. Palhinha
磁铁
79
活跃度
79
活跃度
64
传球
15
对抗
L. Bergvall
狙击手
100%
转化率
100%
转化率
1
进球
1
射门
替补
A. Kinsky
观众
0
扑救
0
扑救
0
失球
0
分钟
K. Danso
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
10
总时间
首发
登场
D. Udogie
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
19
总时间
首发
登场
B. Davies
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
R. Bentancur
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
Richarlison
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
19
总时间
首发
登场
B. Johnson
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
10
总时间
首发
登场
W. Odobert
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
11
总时间
首发
登场
R. Kolo Muani
末班车
15
尾段时间
15
尾段时间
0
总时间
首发
登场
历史交锋
| Date | Home | Score | Away | Competition | Venue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/09/13 | West Ham | 0 - 3 | Tottenham | Premier League | London Stadium |
| 2025/05/04 | West Ham | 1 - 1 | Tottenham | Premier League | London Stadium |
| 2024/10/19 | Tottenham | 4 - 1 | West Ham | Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur Stadium |
| 2024/04/02 | West Ham | 1 - 1 | Tottenham | Premier League | London Stadium |
| 2023/12/07 | Tottenham | 1 - 2 | West Ham | Premier League | Tottenham Hotspur Stadium |
| 2023/07/18 | Tottenham | 2 - 3 | West Ham | Friendlies Clubs | Optus Stadium |
West Ham Win
Tottenham Win
Draw
联赛积分榜
P: 4 GD: +5
P: 4 GD: +8
P: 4 GD: +7
P: 4 GD: +1
P: 4 GD: +6
P: 4 GD: +2
P: 4 GD: +2
P: 4 GD: +4
P: 4 GD: +3
P: 4 GD: 0
P: 4 GD: -1
P: 4 GD: -2
P: 4 GD: -2
P: 4 GD: -3
P: 4 GD: -4
P: 4 GD: -5
P: 4 GD: -3
P: 4 GD: -7
P: 4 GD: -4
联赛积分榜
P: 31 GD: +39
P: 30 GD: +32
P: 31 GD: +13
P: 30 GD: +3
P: 31 GD: +8
P: 31 GD: +15
P: 31 GD: +4
P: 31 GD: +2
P: 31 GD: -1
P: 31 GD: +4
P: 31 GD: -4
P: 31 GD: -1
P: 31 GD: -2
P: 30 GD: -2
P: 31 GD: -11
P: 30 GD: -7
P: 30 GD: -15
P: 30 GD: -19
P: 31 GD: -28
赛前预告与赛后回顾,帮你判断哪些比赛值得一看
Souček's Red Card Seals West Ham's Descent Into Crisis
表现平平 Futmetrix 评分: 43/100. A dominant Spurs performance buried by a catastrophic moment that transformed a competitive first half into a one-sided demolition.
When One Red Card Rewrites the Entire Narrative
West Ham arrived at the London Stadium with nothing to lose and everything to prove. Eighteenth place, a goal difference of minus-seven, and a form line reading LWLL—this was a team drowning. Tottenham, meanwhile, sat third with a +7 goal difference and momentum coursing through their veins. The Stakes were suffocating: one side fighting for their Premier League life, the other consolidating a top-four position.
For 47 minutes, West Ham held firm. The Hammers compressed space, limited Spurs to half-chances, and kept the scoreline level despite possessing just 36% of the ball. Then came the pivot. Tottenham's opener arrived via P.M. Sarr, assisted by Xavi Simons, and the Balance shifted decisively. Seven minutes later, Tomáš Souček received his marching orders for a foul in the 54th minute. What had been a competitive Intensity suddenly evaporated.
With a man advantage, Spurs became relentless. Lucas Bergvall, the 18-year-old midfielder orchestrating chaos, added a goal and an assist to his evening's work—a complete performance that announced his arrival as a genuine threat. Micky van de Ven joined the scoring, rising unmarked to head home Bergvall's cross in the 64th minute. By then, the contest was no longer a match; it was a reckoning.
The corner pressure was relentless—13 corners for Spurs, a constant battering ram against a West Ham defense now fighting in the dark. Guglielmo Vicario made four saves, but he was rarely troubled. The Hammers managed seven shots; Spurs fired 14. The xG told the story: 0.60 to 1.29. This wasn't a match decided by individual brilliance; it was a match decided by a single moment of indiscipline that exposed the vast gulf between a top-four side and a relegation-form team.
Bergvall's 8.2 rating and van de Ven's 7.9 reflect a Spurs squad operating at a different altitude. West Ham's season, meanwhile, has entered freefall territory. Three points from four games. Minus-seven goal difference. A red card that might define their entire campaign.
Key Questions
How did the red card for Tomáš Souček impact the match?
It transformed a competitive first half into a rout. Souček's 54th-minute dismissal gave Spurs numerical superiority; West Ham crumbled, conceding twice in seven minutes. Tottenham's corner pressure (13 total) became suffocating.
What does this mean for West Ham's season?
Alarming. Three points from four games, 18th place, minus-seven goal difference. This loss exposes a team in genuine relegation danger. Defensive fragility and lack of attacking threat (0.60 xG) are critical vulnerabilities.
Why is this match rated 42/100?
The red card destroyed competitive Balance. Three goals lack dramatic tension when one team plays 36 minutes with ten men. High Stakes (7.0) and Intensity (7.0) offset by predictability post-dismissal.
什么是 Futmetrix Score?
Futmetrix Score 是我们对比赛观赏性的0-100评分。我们综合比赛激烈程度、均衡度、重要性和球星效应,告诉你这场比赛是否值得观看。
London Derby Desperation at the Stadium
表现平平 Futmetrix 评分: 42/100. While Tottenham aim to arrest their slide toward the mid-table, West Ham are fighting for their Premier League lives in a high-stakes survival struggle.
The Setup
As the whistle blows on September 13, 2025, West Ham find themselves in the middle of a grueling relegation battle. Sitting 17th with just 11 points, the Hammers are desperate to convert their Form—which shows flashes of resilience in recent weeks—into a tangible Balance on the league table. For Tottenham, the Stakes are less about survival and more about pride. Their 10th-place standing and a record of three losses in their last five matches suggest a side struggling for consistency despite their superior Stars. This crunch match represents a massive opportunity for the hosts to secure a point of gold against a local rival.
Key Battle
The outcome hinges on whether Jarrod Bowen can breach the resistance of Guglielmo Vicario. Bowen remains the primary outlet for the home side's counter-attacks, but he faces a keeper in Vicario who has been a wall for Spurs, recording 13 saves and maintaining a 4.3 saves-per-game average this season. If Bowen cannot find a way past the Italian's reflexes, West Ham’s survival hopes will take a significant hit under the pressure of the visitors' high line.
Our Prediction
Tottenham are likely to dominate possession, utilizing the creative spark of their midfield to supply an in-form frontline. West Ham will defend deep, looking for the pace of their wingers to exploit the space behind the Spurs full-backs. However, the visitors' individual quality should eventually tell. Expect a tight encounter where Richarlison finds the decisive goal in a 1-2 victory for Tottenham, leaving the Hammers still looking over their shoulders at the bottom three.