Active in J1 League
Career
No transfer history
Jin Okumura Traits
Percentile rankings show how a player compares to others. 90% means they rank higher than 90% of comparable players.
vs Midfielders
Height 14%
Weight 10%
Experience 22%
vs J1 League
Height 7%
Weight 5%
Experience 20%
Player DNA
Five dimensions that show what kind of player they are
Dribbling 24
Shooting 0
Defense 37
Workrate 59
Passing 15
Key Strength 59 Workrate
Area to Watch 0 Shooting
Match Stats
Recent appearances across all competitions
| Date | Fixture | Mins | Rating | G | A | FM Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 2026 | Mito Hollyhock 0-3 Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 65' | 5.8 | 0 | 0 | 48 |
| Oct 25, 2026 | FC Tokyo 6-0 Mito Hollyhock | 78' | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 68 |
| Oct 21, 2026 | Fagiano Okayama 2-0 Mito Hollyhock | 57' | 6.3 | 0 | 0 | 26 |
| Oct 11, 2026 | Mito Hollyhock 1-2 Shimizu S-pulse | 67' | 5.6 | 0 | 0 | 76 |
| Sep 19, 2026 | Yokohama F. Marinos 2-0 Mito Hollyhock | 45' | 5.7 | 0 | 0 | 27 |
| Sep 12, 2026 | Mito Hollyhock 0-1 Kawasaki Frontale | 18' | 6.4 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
| Date | Fixture | FM Score |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 08, 2026 | JEF United Chiba vs Mito Hollyhock | 28 |
| Nov 20, 2026 | Vissel Kobe vs Mito Hollyhock | 29 |
| Nov 25, 2026 | Mito Hollyhock vs Tokyo Verdy | 29 |
| Nov 29, 2026 | Mito Hollyhock vs V-varen Nagasaki | 44 |
| Dec 05, 2026 | Cerezo Osaka vs Mito Hollyhock | 32 |
| Dec 13, 2026 | Nagoya Grampus vs Mito Hollyhock | 41 |
| Dec 19, 2026 | Mito Hollyhock vs FC Tokyo | 48 |
| Feb 13, 2027 | Kashima vs Mito Hollyhock | 57 |
| Feb 20, 2027 | Mito Hollyhock vs Kashiwa Reysol | 57 |
| Feb 27, 2027 | Mito Hollyhock vs Vissel Kobe | 48 |
J. Okumura is a bronze utility contributor, and the early verdict is about breadth rather than one defining weapon. The available information does not name his club, so there is no honest basis for assigning him a team-specific role. His career trophy count is zero. This is a profile still waiting for its first substantial body of honours.
Six appearances and 330 minutes give us an initial outline, but not enough evidence to settle his level. The supplied season evidence describes a versatile contributor, and his strongest dimension is Workrate, a useful foundation for someone asked to cover different duties. Reliability is still emerging; that limited sample is a reason to keep the verdict open, not to dismiss the contribution. The form signal sits above season ability and its direction is steady, yet the last five outings brought no goals or assists. There is a clear gap between that encouraging form reading and attacking output. The WASTEFUL badge puts the finishing issue plainly: his recorded shots have not become goals. There are no unlocks to point to as evidence of another established strength. For now, the best case for Okumura is his potential usefulness across roles, backed by his workrate. The next step is turning those opportunities into visible contributions; until then, this remains an early, cautious assessment rather than a settled judgement.