Golovin's Late Heroics Settle Chaotic Beaujoire Thriller
Must Watch Futmetrix Score: 100/100. In a six-pointer between Nantes fighting relegation and Monaco, second-placed title contenders, eight goals and five lead changes exposed the fragility of both defences—but Monaco's technical superiority ultimately prevailed.
Chaos From the First Whistle
Coulibaly struck inside six minutes, set up by Akliouche, to give Monaco an early edge. But Bahereba Guirassy equalised immediately, capitalising on a Matthis Abline creation that showcased Nantes' creative threat. The intensity spiralled: Balogun restored Monaco's lead (41'), Guirassy levelled again (45'). Five lead changes before half-time told the story—neither defence could hold ground.
The Super-Sub That Broke the Balance
The second half exposed Monaco's dominance in structure. Akliouche extended the advantage to 4-3 (55'), then Aleksandr Golovin—introduced at 69 minutes—delivered the knockout blow with a brace (75', 90'). This substitute brought the balance Nantes couldn't match: two clinical finishes that sealed a 5-3 victory. Mostafa Mohamed's late consolation (80') proved merely cosmetic. Monaco's 9 shots on target versus Nantes' 5, combined with 83% pass accuracy, told the tale of technical control in a goal-fest.
VAR's Decisive Intervention
At the 31st minute, Takumi Minamino's disallowed goal proved pivotal—preventing Monaco from building an insurmountable buffer. This VAR call maintained the stakes and narrative tension. Nantes remain marooned in 15th place with 9 points from 10 matches; Monaco consolidate second spot with 20 points, five clear of third. An eight-goal spectacle that masked fundamental defensive frailties—but rewarded the team with superior technique and composure when it mattered most.
Key Questions
How did VAR change the outcome?
Minamino's disallowed goal (31') prevented Monaco from extending their lead to 3-1. This kept Nantes within striking distance, prolonging the drama.
Why was Abline named top performer for Nantes?
Four key passes and constant creative involvement orchestrated Nantes' attacking play. His 8.7 rating reflected orchestration despite the defeat.
What triggered this eight-goal explosion?
Porous defences, relentless attacking intent, and 37 combined shots. Both sides prioritised goals over stability—a spectacle of intensity.
Why is this match rated 100/100?
Our Futmetrix algorithm analyzed intensity, balance, and stakes. The final score of 100/100 places this match in the "Must Watch" category.