Active in Süper Lig
Career
No transfer history
Mehmet Yeşil Traits
Percentile rankings show how a player compares to others. 90% means they rank higher than 90% of comparable players.
vs Defenders
Height 69%
Weight 63%
Experience 63%
vs Süper Lig
Height 74%
Weight 75%
Experience 62%
Player DNA
Five dimensions that show what kind of player they are
Dribbling 18
Shooting 5
Defense 63
Workrate 22
Passing 55
Key Strength 63 Defense
Area to Watch 5 Shooting
Match Stats
Recent appearances across all competitions
| Date | Fixture | Mins | Rating | G | A | FM Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 01, 2026 | Amed 5-1 Eyüpspor | 85' | 6.9 | 0 | 0 | 86 |
| Oct 24, 2026 | Samsunspor 1-2 Amed | 7' | - | 0 | 0 | 93 |
| Oct 17, 2026 | Amed 1-0 Konyaspor | 95' | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 35 |
| Oct 10, 2026 | Gençlerbirliği S.K. 2-2 Amed | 0' | - | 0 | 0 | 87 |
| Sep 20, 2026 | Amed 3-2 Beşiktaş | 13' | 6.5 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| Sep 13, 2026 | Amed 5-0 Başakşehir | 0' | - | 0 | 0 | 49 |
| Sep 06, 2026 | Kasımpaşa 2-2 Amed | 4' | 6.1 | 0 | 0 | 78 |
| Aug 31, 2026 | Amed 2-1 Trabzonspor | 37' | 8.0 | 0 | 1 | 96 |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Kocaelispor 2-0 Amed | 45' | 6.3 | 0 | 0 | 30 |
| Aug 16, 2026 | Amed 3-0 Erzurumspor FK | 90' | 7.2 | 0 | 0 | 47 |
| Date | Fixture | FM Score |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 07, 2026 | Galatasaray vs Amed | 96 |
| Nov 21, 2026 | Amed vs Rizespor | 72 |
| Nov 28, 2026 | Gaziantep FK vs Amed | 54 |
| Dec 05, 2026 | Amed vs Alanyaspor | 66 |
| Dec 11, 2026 | Çorum FK vs Amed | 76 |
| Dec 18, 2026 | Amed vs Göztepe | 87 |
| Jan 17, 2027 | Fenerbahçe vs Amed | 83 |
| Jan 24, 2027 | Erzurumspor FK vs Amed | 47 |
| Jan 31, 2027 | Amed vs Kocaelispor | 62 |
| Feb 07, 2027 | Trabzonspor vs Amed | 81 |
M. Yeşil is this season’s Bronze Utility player, although no club name is supplied. His identity is built on filling needs rather than owning one attacking role. With no career trophy wins recorded, this profile is less about established honours and more about earning a dependable place through adaptable contributions.
Seven appearances have produced 292 minutes, enough to reveal a supporting role without presenting a complete season picture. His SQUAD PLAYER badge captures the appeal: a dependable option who can be called upon when the side needs cover or a different tactical function. Defense is the clearest strength. His value is more likely to come through positional discipline, closing space and limiting opposition progress than through decisive work near goal. The concern is form. His output has dropped well below the steadier level suggested by his broader season work, and he is searching for rhythm after a quiet spell without a goal contribution. That makes any attacking claims difficult to support. The positive is that he appears comfortable with a functional brief and does not need to dominate possession to contribute. Reliability is still emerging because the sample is limited, but those minutes provide a useful foundation rather than a final judgement.
Our verdict is cautious. Yeşil’s versatility can help squad depth, but he needs more regular minutes and a steadier level before his role feels secure. If he maintains his defensive discipline and adds greater influence away from the ball, he can become a more trusted rotation piece. For now, he is functional, restrained and still developing.